Cassius' caracterization

“Why man, he doth bestride the narrow world like a Colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs, and peep about to find ourselves dishonorable graves.”
(Act 1, Scene 2, Line 133-136) This quotation shows how Cassius felt before the assassination of Julius Caesar. He clearly was driven by ambition and envy in his actions. His justification for doing it was because of his ambition forbid him to have anyone above him, and he envied Caesar’s power.

It is said that when men with great ambition clash, major conflicts happen. Both Cassius and Caesar were extremely ambitious. Cassius was motivated by ambition because of his fear that Caesar might take away his power when Caesar becomes king, and Cassius just hated the fact that Caesar had more power than him. Perhaps, Cassius might have wanted to become a king himself. This drives him into killing Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar knew that Cassius was ambitious, and he makes a characterization of Cassius in Act 1 Scene 2 Line 191-196 to Anthony: “Let me have men about me that are fat, sleek-headed men and such as sleep-a-nights. Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look. He thinks too much. Such men are dangerous.” This characterizes Cassius as an ambitious, and a dangerous person, whom Julius Caesar definitely hated. The quotation also shows how Cassius is thought of in the public. After this quotation, it should be clear that Cassius was motivated by ambition. Also, little did Julius Caesar know, that a conspiracy was being made against him by Cassius. Cassius, in Act 1 Scene 3, line 121-124, talks of the conspiracy he is making to Casca: “there’s a bargain made. Now know you, Casca, I have moved already some certain of the noblest-minded Romans to undergo with me an enterprise.” This quotation means that Cassius had gathered some “noble- minded” Romans to assassinate Caesar. This quotation clearly shows this.

how Cassius was so motivated by ambition, to the point that he carefully planned and gathered people to kill Caesar. Cassius’s ambition, was definitely not noble or worthy, as his ambition was driven by personal gain.

Envy is one of the biggest concepts of the play Julius Caesar: many of the characters in the book were driven by envy. Cassius was one of them: he was driven by envy, as he was envious of Caesar’s power, and wanted to have it. Like Cassius’s ambition, his envy drives him into killing Caesar. Before the assassination of Julius Caesar, when Cassius is manipulating Brutus to join in the conspiracy, Cassius constantly complains about how powerful Caesar is compared to him on Act 1 Scene 2 line 115-118: “Did I the tired Caesar and this man is now become a god, and Cassius is a wretched creature, and must bend his body if Caesar carelessly but nod on him.” This shows how Cassius is so weak compared to Caesar, to the point that Cassius has to bow to Caesar, even when Caesar carelessly just nods on him. This shows how Cassius is extremely envious about his lack of power compared to Julius Caesar. Cassius’s envy is further characterized after the death of Cassius and Brutus, Anthony expresses what he thought about the conspirators on Act 5 Scene 5, line 74-75: “All the conspirators save only he (Brutus) did that they did in envy of great Caesar”. Anthony is saying that all the conspirators except for Brutus killed Julius Caesar in envy. This is yet another Characterization made by Cassius’s enemies, which say that Cassius, along with other Conspirators except for Brutus. This is also another public view of Cassius, and the Cassius readers know of. This quotation summarizes Cassius as a person. Cassius’s envy was definitely not noble or worthy, as this motivator was solely for his personal gain.

Cassius was envious of Julius Caesar’s power, and his ambition forbid him to have anyone above him. He was stinking with ambition, to the point that even Julius Caesar was well aware of Cassius’s ambition. His envy was well known among his enemies, so did Cassius’s friends, as he constantly complained about how Caesar has grown to be so powerful. These motivators led Cassius to successfully kill Julius Caesar, hoping that this will give him power, to satisfy his ambition and envy. However, Cassius was only able to achieve his goal partially, as he wasn’t able to gain power from killing Caesar, but instead, lost everything he ever had, and died. The reason why he didn’t succeed was because he listened to Brutus too much without any argument, which led to his downfall. Cassius’s main motivators say that Cassius’s goal wasn’t noble at all, because Cassius was driven by personal gain, not by the common good like Brutus…

Source for picture:

http://www.josephhaworth.com/images/Fellow%20Actors/Lawrence%20Barrett/Lawrence%20Barrett%20(1838-1891)%20as%20Cassius-Illustration-B&W-Resized.jp

Collage

The collage

Collage reflection

Think creatively:

I think that I thought creatively while making the collage, because I was trying to think of a design that was clear, and something that showed that I put some thought into the collage. Also, I considered about having the pictures filling the paper, might make it hard for people to look at clearly, so I put as few pictures as possible, to make sure that the collage is neat and easy to look at.

Reason critically:

While making the collage, I didn’t reason critically, because I never thought about how empty the collage might look after I finish. Also, later on, when I saw the collages other students made, I was amazed to see that Collages look better when they are full of pictures and are empty.

Communicate effectively

Communicating effectively was one of the biggest part of the collage as I had to communicate my message with limited space.

Live ethically

My collage somewhat created empathy for the lost boys because it showed how hard their lives were, and how they were cheated from the things they were told they would get. The quotes helped me show this very well. I think that it did evoke my viewers emotional response.

Sources

Picture: http://pelogifam.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/lost-boys.jpg

The lost boys of Sudan

Peter Dut, is a sudanese refugee, and one of the "lost boys", who is documented his first year in America, along with Santino. Although they walk different path in America, both of them face many difficulties in America. This post will discuss about the difficulties and the conflicts Peter Dut faced in the Docudrama "The Lost boys of Sudan".

Peter Dut was once a member of the Dinka tribe. When Peter Dut was very young, his tribe were attacked by Sudanese militia men. That night, many of Peter's friends, and family member were killed by the genocide. Peter, along with thousands of other boys, and some girls, survived it. They traveled to countries like Kenya for refugee and asylum. On the way, many of them were killed because of starvation, lions, and more gunfire. Those who survived were called as the lost boys.

Peter Dut, and the survivors, lived in a refugee camp for 9 years. He takes an examination to go to America, and passes. On the last day of the refugee camp, he starts to get excited, as he expresses America to be a heavenly place.

When he arrives in America, begins the cycle of culture shock. He finds everything wonderful, and what he thought of to be true. Although life is very different, he starts to adjust to the new life style. For example, he found the African-Americans very different from them. He expresses that the African Americans are very aggressive, and don't play smart. He makes a racial comment that this behavior helps them steal things. In Houston, Peter didn't get a job, or an education, so found Houston not such a good place to live, so he moves to Kensas to get a better life.

Peter, when he goes to highschool in Kensas, he is flabbergasted by the amount of students there are, and starts his adjustment again in Kensas. He starts to learn how high schoolers of America lives, and adjusts to it. However, h finds his life hard, as he wonders how a poor person without could compete with a rich person with parents. This presses on him even harder, as he realizes that in the school basketball team, dismissed him in the trials, because he doesn't know enough to play Basket ball. So, he studies hard to get to college.

Although not shown in the film, he gets a bachelor degree in an University, and returns to Sudan, because he couldn't addjust to the life in Sudan properly.

Solo/ Duet acting Julius Caesar

"O pardon me thou bleeding piece of earth,
That I am meek and gentle with these butchers
Thou art the ruins of the noblest man
That ever lived in the tide of times.
Woe to the hand that shed this costly blood!
Over thy wounds now do I prophesy
(which like dumb mouths do ope their ruby lips,
To beg the voice and utterance of my tongue),
A curse shall light upon the limbs of men;
Domestic fury and fierce civil strife
Shall cumber all the parts of Italy;
Blood and destruction shall be so in use
And dreadful objects so familiar,
That mothers shall but smile when they behold
Their infants quartered with the hands of w
All pity chok'd with custom of fell deeds;
And Caesar's spirit, ranging for revenge,
With ate by his side come hot from hell,
Shall in these confines with a monarch's voice
Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war,
That this foul deeds shall smell above the earth
With carrison men groaning for burial."
Mark Anthony, Act 3, scene 1, line 263-275


In this passage, shows Anthony's fierce and deep loyalty he has to Caesar, and that he is capable of deep thought, unlike how he is thought to be by others, such as Brutus. For example, Brutus says that Anthony is nothing but a limb to Caesar, meaning that Anthony wouldn't be able to do anything After Caesar is dead. Brutus, however thought that the only thing Anthony could do is to kill himself for the sake of Julius Caesar, but Brutus finds even that unlikely, because Anthony is used to Company, games, and Parties. This is proved completely wrong, in this passage, as he grieves Caesar's death, and makes a soliloquy about what he is going to do to avenge Caesar's death.

School of Athens reflecting Renaissance ... And Pilot Sashimi in the school of Athens

Art: The mirror of society

How did the school of Athens mirror the Renaissance
The school of Athens, is a painting by Raphael, which was made in 1509-1510AD. The painting is the vision of a humanist dream. The painting includes several characters of no repetition, and each of them symbolizing an important person… The school of Athens is the mirror of the Renaissance, as this piece doesn't include kings, saints, or Jesus, but a group of revolutionary thinkers, artists and scientists from the Greek times to Renaissance. There are 2 conflicting sides. One side represents the side which is studying the world beyond what we could sense (philosophy), and the other side is studying about things we can observe with our 5 senses (science, math, Architecture). In Renaissance, its openness helped both of the sides to improve drastically. The Renaissance encouraged great thinkers and new ideas, and celebrated those in the past. These aspects of the Renaissance are shown directly in the School of Athens.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pilot Sashimi in the school of Athens.
If I ever had the luck to be in the painting "The school of Athens, painted by Raphael in the year 1510-1511, I would like to be Aristotle, who is in the middle of the painting, wearing a blue and grey Toga. The reason I would like to be Aristotle is because of the idea he brings and the position he is in the whole painting...

Aristotle is a philosopher, who was taught by Plato, and taught Alexander the Great. Aristotle is the founder of formal logic, an idea that was pioneered by zoology. Although many of the major scientific advances made by the world is made by tackling Aristotle's idea, one shouldn't forget that all scientists who came after him are in debt to him, as he was the one who created formal logic. Also, one shouldn't forget that his ideas were made 23 centuries ago.

In the painting, Aristotle represents the side which is interested in the world that we could see and could observe. Aristotle is in the middle of the painting along with Plato. I would like to be Aristotle, as he is one of the figures that get the most attention, and the fact that he is presumingly the leader of the half which believes in observing the world by our senses. Aristotle's idea agrees to mine, as I think that the world has to be observed, and not thought about. I enjoy observing and talking about what is happening around me,l and what has happened before me. Aristotle was the same. When I grow up, perhaps,I would like to be like him, if I ever have the fortune to do so...





















Sources
http://www.claudiampublications.com/images/Reflection.jpg
http://peanut1red.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/aristotle3.jpg

http://www.hschamberlain.net/kant/leonardo.jpg

I think that Leonardo Da Vinci was a true renaissance man,because of his characteristics, his ideas, and his way of observation. This is easy to see, even when the only things we know about him are his notes (with 19,000 pages missing). For me, all I have seen are the exhibition of the designs he made, but never built, but recently built to show his genius. Many of his ideas leaped hundreds of years, to the point that they fill us with amazement to this day.

If you look at the exhibition, there are plenty of things to be amazed at. Although it doesn't work, it has the exhibition of the first robot in the shape of a human, which Leonardo Da Vinci built with his knowledge of the human body, and his knowledge of machinery. It is clad in the design of the armor of the Italian Knight. It can do several tasks such as sitting up, moving its arms, neck, and an anatomically correct its jaw. It is the fruit of Leonardo's anatomical research. Unfortunately, the robot in the exhibition couldn't do these things, probably because of its price, size and weight. It is so advanced for its age, that NASA is using the design to make their own robot, which is called the "Anthrobot". They are using Leonardo's ideas due to its correct, human like movements.

Leonardo Da Vinci also was the first person to think of the tank. Although never built, is such a remarkable design which works. This idea was outsmarted only 500 years later, in the first world war.

Leonardo Da Vinci revolutionized the way of painting, by using the oil painting to make a more radiant color, which would soon spread all around the world.This way of painting is even used today.

Leonardo Da Vinci advanced many of the concepts and the idea that was being reborn in the Renaissance in too many ways to mention. He was the expertise of so many things. He was the true Renaissance man.